In part 2 of this 3-part series, we addressed how to properly prepare bulk field samples for testing in the lab, necessary equipment, and helpful tips. Now that you understand how to perform all the pre-work on samples prior to testing, we’ll cover test procedures for effective determination of the particle size distribution of coarse aggregates.
Particle size determinations on large samples of aggregate are necessary to ensure that aggregates perform as intended for their specified use. A sieve analysis, or gradation test determines the distribution of aggregate particles by size within a given sample. This information can then be used to determine compliance with design and production requirements. Data can also be used to better understand the relationship between aggregates or blends and to predict trends during production.
A known mass of material is placed on top of a group of nested sieves (arranged in order of decreasing size from top to bottom) and mechanically shaken for a designated period of time. After shaking is complete, the operator weighs the material retained on each of the sieves using one of two methods:
- Cumulative method – Each sieve fraction, beginning with the coarsest, is placed in a previously tared pan and weighed. This process is repeated until all fractions and the bottom pan have been added and weighed. This is a good time saving option since you don’t have to empty out or tare the pan on the scale.
- Non-cumulative method – Operator weighs the contents of each sieve fraction separately, waiting to discard material until the entire test is complete.
The technician then calculates the amount retained and passing the sieve to the nearest 0.1% by total mass. Calculation is performed as follows:
- Cumulative method – As each retained fraction is added, divide the cumulative mass by the total mass of the sample and divide by 100 to calculate percent retained. subtract the cumulative percent retained on a given sieve from 100 to calculate percent passing.
- Non-cumulative method – Divide the mass retained on each sieve by the total and multiply by 100 to calculate percent retained. Calculate percent passing by subtracting the percent retained on the sieve nested beneath.
The full procedure is outlined in ASTM C136 (AASHTO T-27).
- Gilson Testing Screen and Gilson Test Master® Testing Screen offer accurate particle size separations Both are designed for coarse materials of mid-range density such as limestone or gravel aggregates. The Test-Master features quieter stable operation and easy sample introduction via an integrated hopper.
- Gilson Porta Screen is an effective alternative to the equipment options above, but takes up less space while efficiently processing materials down to No.200 (75μm).
- Sieve Shakers are another option for coarse materials up to 1 or 2in, depending on the shaker. Check out our guide to select the appropriate model for your application.
- 12in Sieves are best for coarse size fractions.
- High-Capacity Balance to weigh total sample and separated fractions.
- Clean-N-Weigh Accessory is helpful for processing fraction weights. The chute-end handling pan used for collection can be positioned directly onto an electronic balance for immediate collection of fraction weights. If the balance is connected to a computer, data can go directly to a spreadsheet for calculation and reporting.
- Avoid overloading sieves. Total material retained on a sieve at completion should be less than one to two layers deep. More will cause blinding of the mesh and inaccurate results. If needed, an additional coarser sieve can reduce the load on sieves below. For coarse aggregates, ASTM C136 specifies that mass retained in kg shouldn’t exceed the product of 2.5 × (sieve opening, mm × (effective sieving area, m2)).
- Allow enough time on a sieve shaker or testing screen for complete separation. For materials that have not been processed previously, a rule of thumb is to weigh the fraction, process for an additional minute and weigh again. If the difference in percent passing exceeds 1%, add an additional minute and repeat until the difference is less than a percent.
- Watch for degradation. Some brittle or friable materials can break apart during separation, leading to inaccurate results.
- Consider reducing shaker time intervals or using a different method.
- Check sieves for wear, torn mesh or distorted openings regularly since this can bias test results.
- Do not use tools or probes to dislodge trapped particles since this will damage the mesh.
- Take care when transferring material to the tare weighing pan (loss of material affects results).
- Don’t forget to pre-dry your sample as we covered in part 2 of this series.